Selected Works
  • AI Research
  • Healthcare
  • Award Winner

“Get time back. Move care forward.”

M.A.R.S: AI Clinical Documentation

Hospital LLM Datathon

Period
September 2025- October 2025
Role
Team LeadSystem DesignPrompt EngineeringClinical Evaluation
Team
Team Lead (Me)2 LLM Engineers1 Clinical Advisor
Org
Seoul National University Hospital
10s Summary

What?

Built an LLM system that writes discharge summaries from real hospital records. Won 2nd place in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital's datathon.

Why?

Doctors spend up to 30% of their time turning messy notes into discharge summaries, and a national strike left them even more short-staffed.

How?

Cleaned up noisy, duplicated records, then designed department-specific, multi-step prompts with guardrails against hallucination, validated by clinicians.

I'm redesigning this case study as a web page. Every detail is in the PDF version below.

Overview

What is M.A.R.S, and what did I do here?

OVERVIEW

M.A.R.S

: Medical Auto-documentation with Real-world Structuring

A two-round, 2-month datathon hosted by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.
Built an LLM system that turns raw clinical notes into discharge summaries, using MIMIC-IV dataset and real notes from 400 patients.

MY ROLE

Team Lead

  • Assembled the team and ran the project end to end
  • Researched ~30 papers and clinical domain knowledge to define the approach
  • Built the data cleansing, prompt design, and full system architecture
  • Validated & bridged: ran clinician evaluations and translated between clinicians and engineers
  • Presented at the final
RESULT

Re-engineered Clinical Workflow with LLMs

🥇 1st Place @ Preliminary (1 of 100)
🥈 2nd Place @ Final (2 of 10)

Receiving the Excellence Award at the M.A.R.S datathon

Offered Research Role

Invited to co-publish and intern at
SNUBH Center for AI in Healthcare.

Built for Real Deployment

Our system was piloted in SNUBH’s
clinical documentation workflow.

Clinician-Validated

4 departments, 2 feedback rounds,
3.55 → 3.70 satisfaction.

M.A.R.S: AI Clinical Documentation, case study page 1 of 4M.A.R.S: AI Clinical Documentation, case study page 2 of 4M.A.R.S: AI Clinical Documentation, case study page 3 of 4M.A.R.S: AI Clinical Documentation, case study page 4 of 4

Tap a page to open it at full resolution.